Difference between revisions of "Card Tech Minutes 2011.10.12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=== Attendess === * Anthony Scinicariello - St Jude Medical * Bryan Jennings - Medical Micrographics * Dan Roman - ACC * Duncan Wood - Medical Micrographics * Harry Solomon - GE...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
# Scheduling of face to face meeting | # Scheduling of face to face meeting | ||
#* Dec. 12-13, 2011 preferably in Oak Brook | #* Dec. 12-13, 2011 preferably in Oak Brook | ||
| − | #* Action Item: Antje to Check with Chris Carr, whether it is possible to meet at RSNA | + | #* '''Action Item''': Antje to Check with Chris Carr, whether it is possible to meet at RSNA |
| − | # HIMSS Showcase Review | + | # Connectahthon and HIMSS Showcase Review |
| + | #* Organisation team is still evaluating registration and is working on matching up use cases and products | ||
| + | #* REWF is not tested at Connectathon, therefore there is no ECG report creator in Use Case 5 | ||
| + | #* Suggestion is to use a Content creator actor that sends an ECG as a Scanned Document (XDS-SD) | ||
| + | #* '''Action item''': Harry to follow up internally in GE to see whether they could sign up their DSS/OF to participate in REWF as well. | ||
# Effort analysis of profile proposals - Cath Workflow Preprocedure Documentation option | # Effort analysis of profile proposals - Cath Workflow Preprocedure Documentation option | ||
| + | #* Addition of a new transaction to CATH (RID to retrieve CDA documents with pre-procedure information) | ||
| + | #* Alternative solution is to add an XDS content consumer to retrieve the documents | ||
| + | #* No content definition, just to show how documents fit in workflo | ||
| + | #* Open issue 1: workflow of consent documents. Suggestion to treat is as a scanned document, however there are implications for the workflow as where to store the document (Image Manager, EMR system, ...) | ||
| + | #* Open issue 2: Access to lab documentation. Do they need to be structured, so that they could be used in the report or is it just informative? | ||
| + | #* Effort estimates: under the assumption the changes are for adding references to documents in transactions (order msg and MWL) and not to define data access effort is about one workday. | ||
| + | #* However the order msg effects Radiology (since Cardiology references Radiology transaction). Should be coordinated. Harry suggest to make a CP to Radiology during this work item and let Radiology pick it up from there. | ||
| + | #* '''Action item''': Harry to extend proposal to include different options to address this problem, so that TC can decide on efforts for each option during the next meetings. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Next Meeting will be on Oct. 19, 10am EST | ||
Latest revision as of 07:32, 13 October 2011
Attendess
- Anthony Scinicariello - St Jude Medical
- Bryan Jennings - Medical Micrographics
- Dan Roman - ACC
- Duncan Wood - Medical Micrographics
- Harry Solomon - GE
- Nick Gawritt - Heartbase
- Paul Seifert - Agfa
- Rich Fronek - Cardiac Science
- Tom Dolan - Philips
- Antje Schroeder Siemens
Meeting Notes
- Scheduling of face to face meeting
- Dec. 12-13, 2011 preferably in Oak Brook
- Action Item: Antje to Check with Chris Carr, whether it is possible to meet at RSNA
- Connectahthon and HIMSS Showcase Review
- Organisation team is still evaluating registration and is working on matching up use cases and products
- REWF is not tested at Connectathon, therefore there is no ECG report creator in Use Case 5
- Suggestion is to use a Content creator actor that sends an ECG as a Scanned Document (XDS-SD)
- Action item: Harry to follow up internally in GE to see whether they could sign up their DSS/OF to participate in REWF as well.
- Effort analysis of profile proposals - Cath Workflow Preprocedure Documentation option
- Addition of a new transaction to CATH (RID to retrieve CDA documents with pre-procedure information)
- Alternative solution is to add an XDS content consumer to retrieve the documents
- No content definition, just to show how documents fit in workflo
- Open issue 1: workflow of consent documents. Suggestion to treat is as a scanned document, however there are implications for the workflow as where to store the document (Image Manager, EMR system, ...)
- Open issue 2: Access to lab documentation. Do they need to be structured, so that they could be used in the report or is it just informative?
- Effort estimates: under the assumption the changes are for adding references to documents in transactions (order msg and MWL) and not to define data access effort is about one workday.
- However the order msg effects Radiology (since Cardiology references Radiology transaction). Should be coordinated. Harry suggest to make a CP to Radiology during this work item and let Radiology pick it up from there.
- Action item: Harry to extend proposal to include different options to address this problem, so that TC can decide on efforts for each option during the next meetings.
- Next Meeting will be on Oct. 19, 10am EST