Difference between revisions of "Card Tech Minutes 2010.01.07"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
#**'''ACTION ITEM:''' The status page for this profile on the wiki page needs to be updated.
 
#**'''ACTION ITEM:''' The status page for this profile on the wiki page needs to be updated.
 
#*3D/4D Echo
 
#*3D/4D Echo
−
#**The use case list has been sent to Dr. Katz and Dr. Keller for review.
+
#**The use case list has been sent to Dr. Katz and Dr. Keller for review. Antje is awaiting their feedback.
−
#**Sample use cases can be found on the wiki.
+
#**There is still concern about DICOM WG 11's proposal for how presentation state will work.  This may cause a delay in future profile development.
−
#**Questions from the workgroup have been assembled and input is requested.
 
−
#**There is concern about that DICOM WGs 11 and 12 will not produce a standard for 3D presentation state in time to create a profile in 2011.
 
−
#**The white paper for 2010 is on track though.
 
 
#*Image-Enabled Office
 
#*Image-Enabled Office
−
#**A workgroup has been assembled and will be holding a call Wednesday 1/6/2010.
+
#**The workgroup held a call on Wednesday 1/6/2010 and discussed several issues:
−
#**This profile has been discussed with the CCHIT Cardiovascular Expert Panel.  They are interested and support it.
+
#***The DICOM modality work list needs to be bundled in the PM EMR
 +
#***There is no direct control of data acquisition in the EMR
 +
#***Some type of web based messaging has to be made available between the EMR and the PACS
 +
#***Several others were discussed
 
#*Cardiology Report Content
 
#*Cardiology Report Content
−
#**No major update other than that HL7 is having a closed ballot for procedural note in early January.
+
#**No major update other than that HL7 ballot for procedural is currently out.
 +
#**Harry has a mapping of Cardiology terms to SNOMED that he will post or link to on the wiki.
 
#*Resting ECG Workflow
 
#*Resting ECG Workflow
−
#**Milestones are still needed.
+
#**'''ACTION ITEM:''' Milestones are still needed.
−
#**The concern over emergency cases and whether or not they are special cases was discussed.  The group noted that these cases should be similar to cases of unidentified patients in trauma imaging and scheduled workflow.
+
#**The workgroup hasn't met recently but Barry will be setting up weekly calls.
−
#**Refer to Cath and Radiology profiles.
+
#**The majority of the ECG discussion focused on how to handle reporting. There was debate over use of DICOM SR, DICOM encapsulated CDA, DICOM encapsulated PDF, or all of the above. Each has pros and cons depending on the use cases.  The use of HL7-CDA was also suggested since currently it is more widely used.
−
#Review of Board Report
+
#**It was also suggested that the ECG profile could just handle reporting within Cardiology and perhaps the Cardiology Report Content could handle other reporting.
−
#*Kevin O'Donnell added his updates to the report.
+
#**The workgroup needs to brainstorm on how it would like to handle the reporting issue.
−
#*The Board reviews one domain/month.  The co-chairs of the Domain Coordination Committee preview first.
+
#The next Technical Committee call is scheduled for Thursday, 1/21/10, at 10 AM ET.
−
#**'''ACTION ITEM:''' The Cardiology Domain needs to get on the schedule for review (the initial review time was missed).
 

Revision as of 14:39, 8 January 2010

Attendees

  • Tom Dolan (Co-chair), Philips
  • Antje Schoeder (Co-chair), Siemens
  • Mary Schneider, GE
  • Barry Brown, Mortara
  • Dan Roman, ACC Staff
  • Keith Klassy, AMICAS
  • Micha Coleman, Medtronic
  • Harry Solomon, GE
  • Mary Schneider, GE
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa Healthcare
  • Bijoy Sundersingh, Philips
  • Glenn Guillemette, Philips

Minutes

  1. The Planning Committee will be holding a call in late January, most likely Thursday, 1/28 at 4 PM ET. Final details about the call will be sent next week.
  2. Tom is working on finalizing the Board Report. It will go to the Board Co-Chairs in February and most likely to the Board for review in March.
  3. In addition to the regular status check of all the profiles, the Technical Committee will do a 20 minute, in depth review of one of the profiles according the following schedule:
    • 1/21 - Cardiology Report Content
    • 2/4 - Image-Enabled Office and the 3D/4D Echo and EP Implant white papers
    • 2/18 - Resting ECG Workflow (draft review)
    • 3/4 - Image Enabled Office (draft review)
    • 3/18 - Cardiology Report Content (draft review)
  4. CP Process - ACTION ITEM: Tom and Antje to talk offline about how to handle the CPs.
  5. Updates from Profile Workgroups
    • EP Implant Workflow
      • No update.
      • ACTION ITEM: The status page for this profile on the wiki page needs to be updated.
    • 3D/4D Echo
      • The use case list has been sent to Dr. Katz and Dr. Keller for review. Antje is awaiting their feedback.
      • There is still concern about DICOM WG 11's proposal for how presentation state will work. This may cause a delay in future profile development.
    • Image-Enabled Office
      • The workgroup held a call on Wednesday 1/6/2010 and discussed several issues:
        • The DICOM modality work list needs to be bundled in the PM EMR
        • There is no direct control of data acquisition in the EMR
        • Some type of web based messaging has to be made available between the EMR and the PACS
        • Several others were discussed
    • Cardiology Report Content
      • No major update other than that HL7 ballot for procedural is currently out.
      • Harry has a mapping of Cardiology terms to SNOMED that he will post or link to on the wiki.
    • Resting ECG Workflow
      • ACTION ITEM: Milestones are still needed.
      • The workgroup hasn't met recently but Barry will be setting up weekly calls.
      • The majority of the ECG discussion focused on how to handle reporting. There was debate over use of DICOM SR, DICOM encapsulated CDA, DICOM encapsulated PDF, or all of the above. Each has pros and cons depending on the use cases. The use of HL7-CDA was also suggested since currently it is more widely used.
      • It was also suggested that the ECG profile could just handle reporting within Cardiology and perhaps the Cardiology Report Content could handle other reporting.
      • The workgroup needs to brainstorm on how it would like to handle the reporting issue.
  6. The next Technical Committee call is scheduled for Thursday, 1/21/10, at 10 AM ET.
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Card_Tech_Minutes_2010.01.07&oldid=39523"