Difference between revisions of "Bed Management"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''BED MANAGEMENT (BED) Profile''' |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | This profile is to manage the interoperability issues that surround the bed management tasks that are involved with admissions to the various hospital departments from the emergency department. | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''''Due to a lack of interoperability in the emergency department several problems occur: |
| + | *Work inefficiencies are decreased for emergency department providers and other staff with no mechanism to monitor patient status in real-time | ||
| + | *Delays in patient transfers to other inpatient departments within the hospital occur | ||
| + | *Siloed data which results in poor data quality for process and performance improvement activities and care coordination | ||
''<Insert a simple graphic that, at a glance, visually summarizes what the profile is about. Do not use an actor/transaction diagram here. Show your graphic to someone for 5 seconds (literally) and ask them what it's about. If what they say hits the main points in your summary paragraph, you have succeeded. E.g. a graphic of a hospital, a clinic, and a lab with patient records moving between them. .>'' | ''<Insert a simple graphic that, at a glance, visually summarizes what the profile is about. Do not use an actor/transaction diagram here. Show your graphic to someone for 5 seconds (literally) and ask them what it's about. If what they say hits the main points in your summary paragraph, you have succeeded. E.g. a graphic of a hospital, a clinic, and a lab with patient records moving between them. .>'' | ||
| Line 21: | Line 15: | ||
==Benefits== | ==Benefits== | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | A robust, integrated bed management not only improves patient care, but also impacts a hospital's financial status. The benefits of this profile is: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Increased efficiency | ||
| + | * Reduced delays and waste | ||
| + | * Improved patient transfer and care coordination data, resulting in better predictive planning | ||
==Details== | ==Details== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
==Systems Affected== | ==Systems Affected== | ||
| − | |||
| − | * '' | + | |
| − | * '' | + | * ''Electronic Health Record (EHR)'' |
| − | * '' | + | * ''Admission/Discharge/Transfer (ADT) System'' |
| + | * ''Emergency Department Information System (EDIS)'' | ||
| + | * '''BMS''' | ||
'''Actors & Transactions:''' | '''Actors & Transactions:''' | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==Specification== | ==Specification== | ||
| − | '''Profile Status:''' [[Comments| | + | '''Profile Status:''' [[Comments| Trial Implementation>'' |
| − | |||
'''Documents:''' | '''Documents:''' | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 2 March 2018
BED MANAGEMENT (BED) Profile
This profile is to manage the interoperability issues that surround the bed management tasks that are involved with admissions to the various hospital departments from the emergency department.
Summary
'Due to a lack of interoperability in the emergency department several problems occur:
- Work inefficiencies are decreased for emergency department providers and other staff with no mechanism to monitor patient status in real-time
- Delays in patient transfers to other inpatient departments within the hospital occur
- Siloed data which results in poor data quality for process and performance improvement activities and care coordination
<Insert a simple graphic that, at a glance, visually summarizes what the profile is about. Do not use an actor/transaction diagram here. Show your graphic to someone for 5 seconds (literally) and ask them what it's about. If what they say hits the main points in your summary paragraph, you have succeeded. E.g. a graphic of a hospital, a clinic, and a lab with patient records moving between them. .>
<See Help - Tips and Tricks for details on inserting an image/graphic.>
Benefits
A robust, integrated bed management not only improves patient care, but also impacts a hospital's financial status. The benefits of this profile is:
- Increased efficiency
- Reduced delays and waste
- Improved patient transfer and care coordination data, resulting in better predictive planning
Details
<A few paragraphs, if appropriate, providing more details (mostly in user-speak, not tech-speak) on what the profile does and how it works.>
<If the user might be familiar with the mechanisms used by the profile, you can mention them here. E.g. Evidence Documents is based on DICOM Structured Report (SR) Templates.>
<If the user might have an appreciation for the problems addressed in the profile, you can mention them here, but keep it short. E.g. Mapping HL7 Order fields to DICOM Modality Worklist attributes can be inconsistent in the marketplace, so Scheduled Workflow provides vendors with more detailed instructions.>
Systems Affected
- Electronic Health Record (EHR)
- Admission/Discharge/Transfer (ADT) System
- Emergency Department Information System (EDIS)
- BMS
Actors & Transactions:
<Insert an actor-transaction diagram, and or list of Content Definitions>
Specification
Profile Status: [[Comments| Trial Implementation>
Documents:
<Provide direct links to the specific volumes or supplements, and list the volume sections relevant to this profile. This is a simple inventory of official normative and informative text. If you would like to provide a reading guide or walkthrough of what is in each of the different sections for implementers or users, do that in the Profile FAQ or the Profile Implementation Page linked below. If the profile uses transactions from multiple Tech. Frameworks, repeat the structure below.>
IHE Radiology Technical Framework:
Underlying Standards:
<list all the standards on which the profile is based; if possible with links to sources>
See Also
<The following sections can be left out if there is nothing to point to. This is just to show where such information can go.>
Related Profiles
<List profiles this one depends on, profiles that depend on this one, profiles that are synergistic with this one. Start with the name of the other profile as a link and then explain the relationship.>
- Reporting Workflow [RWF] may use Evidence Documents as inputs to the reporting process.
- Simple Image & Numeric Reports [SINR] may include data copied from Evidence Documents.
- Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging [XDS-I] can be used to share Evidence Documents between sites over a network.
- Portable Data for Imaging [PDI] can store Evidence Documents on media such as CDs.
- Import Reconciliation Workflow [IRWF] can fix patient ids, etc. of Evidence Documents when importing.
Consumer Information
The Profile FAQ Template answers typical questions about what the Profile does. <Replace the link with a link to the actual FAQ page for the Profile>
The Profile Purchasing Template describes considerations when purchasing equipment to deploy this Profile. <Replace the link with a link to the actual Purchasing page for the Profile>
Implementer Information
The Profile Implementation Template provides additional information about implementing this Profile in software. <Replace the link with a link to the actual Implementation page for the Profile>
Reference Articles
<List References (good and bad) (with link if possible) to Journal Articles that mention IHE's work (and hopefully include some analysis). Go ahead, Google: IHE <Profile Name> abstract or Google: IHE <Profile Name> and under the "more" select "Scholar". You might be surprised. >
This page is based on the Profile Overview Template