Difference between revisions of "BIR FT Evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Stevenichols (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::* Yes | ::* Yes | ||
* Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with? | * Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with? | ||
| − | ::* BIR has been tested 19 times since 2011 | + | ::* The BIR Image Display was successfully tested at the NA2012 and EU2012 Connectathons |
| + | ::* BIR IM has been tested 19 times since 2011 | ||
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed? | * Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed? | ||
::* <font color="blue">TBD</font> | ::* <font color="blue">TBD</font> | ||
Revision as of 21:22, 8 February 2023
Proposal
Basic Image Review (BIR) has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.
Technical Committee Checklist
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"
- All BIR CPs below. One remains open. See CP Tracking Spreadsheet
- CP-RAD-206
- CP-RAD-209
- CP-RAD-210
- CP-RAD-211
- CP-RAD-212
- CP-RAD-337
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- CP-RAD-212, "Lower limit of window for NM/PET imgs", is open
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- TBD
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- Yes
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- The BIR Image Display was successfully tested at the NA2012 and EU2012 Connectathons
- BIR IM has been tested 19 times since 2011
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- TBD
Technical Committee Consensus
- TBD
Planning Committee Checklist
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Yes
Eur. 2011 Eur. 2012 Eur. 2014 Eur. 2015 Eur. 2016 NA 2011 NA 2012 NA 2014 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- Akgün Bilgisayar Program ve Hizmetleri San. Tic. Ltd. Sti. IM IM Cerner Corporation IM EBM technologies IM Ekstrem Bir Bilgisayar IM EMC IM GE Precision Healthcare LLC IM Global Imaging OnLine IM J4Care GmbH IM Karos Health IM medavis GmbH IM meddata bilisim ltd.sti.(Meddata information technololgy). IM MILLENSYS IM Sisoft Saglik Bilgi Sistemleri (Healthcare Information Systems) IM Topicus Zorg IM Turmap Information Technologies IM Visbion Ltd IM IM EBM technologies ID Rogan-Delft ID
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes, see above
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Yes, but limited Image Display testing
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- NA
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- EVS DICOM validators
- Test .iso files
- BIR Image Display Connectathon Tests
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Yes
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- TBD
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- No *Steve TODO
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Yes, see Basic Image Review