Difference between revisions of "Anatomic Pathology Structured Report"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Page in construction)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Page in construction
 
Page in construction
 +
 +
__TOC__
 +
 +
==Summary==
 +
''<Describe the profile in about a paragraph using user-oriented language.  Focus on what it accomplishes for a user (i.e. the Use Cases).  Don't get into how it works, leave that to the Details section.>''
 +
 +
''<Insert a simple graphic that, at a glance, visually summarizes what the profile is about.  Do not use an actor/transaction diagram here.  Show your graphic to someone for 5 seconds (literally) and ask them what it's about.  If what they say hits the main points in your summary paragraph, you have succeeded.  E.g. a graphic of a hospital, a clinic, and a lab with patient records moving between them.  .>''
 +
 +
''<See [[Help:Contents#Tips_.26_Tricks| Help - Tips and Tricks]] for details on inserting an image/graphic.>''
 +
 +
==Benefits==
 +
 +
''<List the key benefits the profile provides (e.g. error reduction, increased throughput) and how they come about (e.g. SWF reduces patient errors due to mistyped demographics at the modality by transfering demographics electronically from the Order Filler).  Consider using a bullet list for readability.  If possible, identify benefits that help users and vendors make the business case for the profile.>''
 +
 +
==Details==
 +
 +
''<A few paragraphs, if appropriate, providing more details (mostly in user-speak, not tech-speak) on what the profile does and how it works.>''
 +
 +
''<If the user might be familiar with the mechanisms used by the profile, you can mention them here.  E.g. Evidence Documents is based on DICOM Structured Report (SR) Templates.>''
 +
 +
''<If the user might have an appreciation for the problems addressed in the profile, you can mention them here, but keep it short.  E.g. Mapping HL7 Order fields to DICOM Modality Worklist attributes can be inconsistent in the marketplace, so Scheduled Workflow provides vendors with more detailed instructions.>''
 +
 +
==Systems Affected==
 +
''<List (in user terms) the types of systems they might expect to have implemented actors from this profile, e.g. RIS, PACS, HIS, CAD Workstation, etc. and for each, how it would participate.>''
 +
 +
* ''PACS systems may store, manage, and/or display Evidence Documents.''
 +
* ''Display systems may query, retrieve and display Evidence Documents.''
 +
* ''Reporting workstations may retrieve, process and include details from Evidence Documents in reports
 +
 +
'''Actors & Transactions:'''
 +
 +
''<Insert an actor-transaction diagram, and or list of Content Definitions>''
 +
 +
==Specification==
 +
 +
'''Profile Status:''' [[Comments| Final Text]] 
 +
''<Replace "Final Text" with "Trial Implementation" or "Public Comment" as appropriate.>''
 +
 +
'''Documents:'''
 +
 +
''<Provide direct links to the specific volumes or supplements, and list the volume sections relevant to this profile.  This is a simple inventory of official normative and informative text.  If you would like to provide a reading guide or walkthrough of what is in each of the different sections for implementers or users, do that in the Profile FAQ or the Profile Implementation Page linked below.  If the profile uses transactions from multiple Tech. Frameworks, repeat the structure below.>''
 +
 +
[http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/index.cfm#radiology IHE Radiology Technical Framework:]
 +
:* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8.pdf Vol. 1] - Section 5 (SWF Profile)
 +
:* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8-2.pdf Vol. 2] - Sections 4.8 to 4.10, 4.14 to 4.19, and 4.23
 +
:* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8-3.pdf Vol. 3] - Appendix E
 +
 +
'''Underlying Standards:'''
 +
 +
''<list all the standards on which the profile is based; if possible with links to sources>''
 +
:* [http://dicom.nema.org DICOM]
 +
:* [http://www.hl7.org HL7]
 +
:* ...
 +
 +
==See Also==
 +
 +
''<The following sections can be left out if there is nothing to point to.  This is just to show where such information can go.>''

Revision as of 17:38, 2 August 2011

Page in construction

Summary

<Describe the profile in about a paragraph using user-oriented language. Focus on what it accomplishes for a user (i.e. the Use Cases). Don't get into how it works, leave that to the Details section.>

<Insert a simple graphic that, at a glance, visually summarizes what the profile is about. Do not use an actor/transaction diagram here. Show your graphic to someone for 5 seconds (literally) and ask them what it's about. If what they say hits the main points in your summary paragraph, you have succeeded. E.g. a graphic of a hospital, a clinic, and a lab with patient records moving between them. .>

<See Help - Tips and Tricks for details on inserting an image/graphic.>

Benefits

<List the key benefits the profile provides (e.g. error reduction, increased throughput) and how they come about (e.g. SWF reduces patient errors due to mistyped demographics at the modality by transfering demographics electronically from the Order Filler). Consider using a bullet list for readability. If possible, identify benefits that help users and vendors make the business case for the profile.>

Details

<A few paragraphs, if appropriate, providing more details (mostly in user-speak, not tech-speak) on what the profile does and how it works.>

<If the user might be familiar with the mechanisms used by the profile, you can mention them here. E.g. Evidence Documents is based on DICOM Structured Report (SR) Templates.>

<If the user might have an appreciation for the problems addressed in the profile, you can mention them here, but keep it short. E.g. Mapping HL7 Order fields to DICOM Modality Worklist attributes can be inconsistent in the marketplace, so Scheduled Workflow provides vendors with more detailed instructions.>

Systems Affected

<List (in user terms) the types of systems they might expect to have implemented actors from this profile, e.g. RIS, PACS, HIS, CAD Workstation, etc. and for each, how it would participate.>

  • PACS systems may store, manage, and/or display Evidence Documents.
  • Display systems may query, retrieve and display Evidence Documents.
  • Reporting workstations may retrieve, process and include details from Evidence Documents in reports

Actors & Transactions:

<Insert an actor-transaction diagram, and or list of Content Definitions>

Specification

Profile Status: Final Text <Replace "Final Text" with "Trial Implementation" or "Public Comment" as appropriate.>

Documents:

<Provide direct links to the specific volumes or supplements, and list the volume sections relevant to this profile. This is a simple inventory of official normative and informative text. If you would like to provide a reading guide or walkthrough of what is in each of the different sections for implementers or users, do that in the Profile FAQ or the Profile Implementation Page linked below. If the profile uses transactions from multiple Tech. Frameworks, repeat the structure below.>

IHE Radiology Technical Framework:

  • Vol. 1 - Section 5 (SWF Profile)
  • Vol. 2 - Sections 4.8 to 4.10, 4.14 to 4.19, and 4.23
  • Vol. 3 - Appendix E

Underlying Standards:

<list all the standards on which the profile is based; if possible with links to sources>

See Also

<The following sections can be left out if there is nothing to point to. This is just to show where such information can go.>