Difference between revisions of "2009 sponsor review"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>NAV</td> | <td>NAV</td> | ||
− | <td> | + | <td>Lynn</td> |
− | <td> | + | <td>Reviewed </td> |
− | <td> | + | <td><ul><li>Cover page: Reads “Technical Framework Supplement 2007-2008” Are you labeling all Trial Implementation Supplements as 2008-2009, even though they originated in previous years? Actually, I see that the forums spot for gathering documentation comments is labeled “2009-2010 Supplements for Trial Implementation”. From a vendor/reader’s point-of-view, these documents are for the 2009-2010 testing season (2008-2009 represents the timeframe of the committee’s work on the documents). I guess I prefer representing things from a reader/vendor’s point of view.<li>Document’s file name is not in footer as I have seen in most (all?) other documents. (...later determined with lisa that date alone and not whole file name is preferable content for footer)<li>Likewise, the header content is not consistent with other documents.<li>Page 4: Per your question about whether this is the 2nd or 3rd release for TI, I would change the wording to say that this is “re-released for Trial Implementation” and get rid of counting the years.<li>Starting at Line 184 through line 363, Section heading that should start with 12, have been prefaced with 3 or 3.x. The section heading numbers in the original document do not have this problem.<li>Starting at Line 184 through line 363, Section heading that should start with 12, have been prefaced with 3 or 3.x. The section heading numbers in the original document do not have this problem.<li>Line 676, section 3.27.2: (this is an error in the original that we can correct): change “…as described in ITI TF-2a: 26” to “…as described in ITI TF-2a: 3.26”</ul></td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 10:22, 6 August 2009
This page tracks the progress on reviewing ITI documents returned from the sponsor prior to Aug 2009 publication.
Document | Reviewer | Status | Comments |
Vol 1 | Karen |
Done |
|
Vol 2a | Lynn | Reviewed |
|
2b | Lynn | Reviewed |
|
2x |
Lynn | Reviewed |
|
Vol 3 | Karen | Done | Multiple concerns with tables 4.1-5, 4.1-6 - added bullets that were lost, changed examples to be different format, changed width of last column to better fit the contents. Also TOC needed regeneration. R |
Async | Karen | Done | Title page says Final Text - should say Trial Implementation |
PDO | Not yet returned | ||
XCA | Karen | Reviewed | So many concerns it requires a re-review |
XDR | Lynn | Reviewed |
|
DRR | Karen | ||
MPQ | Lynn | Reviewed | Version with very minor table resizing returned to Lisa. Unresolved extra line on pg. 13....can live with it. |
NAV | Lynn | Reviewed |
|
RFD | Not yet returned | ||
SVS | Not yet returned | ||
Pat Merge | Not yet returned | ||
DSG | Not yet returned | ||
XCPD | Not yet returned | ||
PDO | Not yet returned | ||
PIX/PDQ HL7 V3 | Not yet delivered | ||
DSUB | Not yet delivered |