Difference between revisions of "Talk:PCC Profile Deprecation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) (Created page with "DCC Call 2018-05-22 === Discussion === * Review PCC Process (not individual profiles for deprecation) * Introduction of new "Intent to Deprecate" status * === Questions ===...") |
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
DCC Call 2018-05-22 | DCC Call 2018-05-22 | ||
| − | === | + | === Agenda === |
* Review PCC Process (not individual profiles for deprecation) | * Review PCC Process (not individual profiles for deprecation) | ||
* Introduction of new "Intent to Deprecate" status | * Introduction of new "Intent to Deprecate" status | ||
| − | |||
| − | === Questions === | + | === Questions/Discussion === |
* Should the Intent to Deprecate term be set or flexible? What should the term/range of term be? | * Should the Intent to Deprecate term be set or flexible? What should the term/range of term be? | ||
| − | ** "Proposal to Deprecate" | + | ** Postponed this discussion, will follow up in next meeting |
| − | ** "Consideration for Deprecation" | + | |
| + | * Deprecation Statuses | ||
| + | ** Ideas | ||
| + | *** "Proposal to Deprecate" | ||
| + | *** "Consideration for Deprecation" | ||
** HL7 has used "deprecated" status and standards have been resurrected after community response | ** HL7 has used "deprecated" status and standards have been resurrected after community response | ||
** deprecated, retired, removed - understand the definition of each of these | ** deprecated, retired, removed - understand the definition of each of these | ||
| − | ** IHE only has the status of | + | ** IHE only has the status of "Deprecated/Retired" |
** maybe we should add a status of retired | ** maybe we should add a status of retired | ||
| Line 20: | Line 23: | ||
* Retired | * Retired | ||
** Deprecation is "final" | ** Deprecation is "final" | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Harder to resurrect a profile |
| − | |||
| − | * FTP site management considerations | + | * Impact of addition of new status |
| − | * Identify which existing profiles are deprecated vs retired | + | ** FTP site management considerations |
| + | ** Identify which existing profiles are deprecated vs retired | ||
| − | * Where in the development cycle would the deprecation process be | + | * Where in the development cycle would the deprecation process be executed? |
| − | ** | + | ** take advantage of existing marketing channels (i.e. sent out a note along with public comment emails) |
| − | ** caution against deprecating/intent to deprecate | + | ** caution against deprecating/intent to deprecate profiles that organizations have already spent effort implementing |
* How would deprecation/retirement be handled in profiles already published in final text? | * How would deprecation/retirement be handled in profiles already published in final text? | ||
** Section headers, start of volume 1 profile add text to highlight deprecation status?? | ** Section headers, start of volume 1 profile add text to highlight deprecation status?? | ||
| Line 34: | Line 37: | ||
=== Next Steps === | === Next Steps === | ||
| − | + | * PCC/Tone: define deprecated and retired, and propose back to DCC | |
| − | * PCC: define deprecated and retired, and propose back to DCC | + | * PCC/Tone: identify any PCC specific items and general items on profile deprecation process page and bring back to DCC |
| − | * PCC: identify any PCC specific items and general items and bring back to DCC | ||
* Discuss w/DCC time/term for deprecation | * Discuss w/DCC time/term for deprecation | ||
| + | * Propose to DCC to integration PCC Process to IHE Process | ||
Latest revision as of 11:25, 22 May 2018
DCC Call 2018-05-22
Agenda
- Review PCC Process (not individual profiles for deprecation)
- Introduction of new "Intent to Deprecate" status
Questions/Discussion
- Should the Intent to Deprecate term be set or flexible? What should the term/range of term be?
- Postponed this discussion, will follow up in next meeting
- Deprecation Statuses
- Ideas
- "Proposal to Deprecate"
- "Consideration for Deprecation"
- HL7 has used "deprecated" status and standards have been resurrected after community response
- deprecated, retired, removed - understand the definition of each of these
- IHE only has the status of "Deprecated/Retired"
- maybe we should add a status of retired
- Ideas
- Deprecated
- Indication that committee has stopped maintenance
- Eligible to move out of deprecated status and back into active status
- Retired
- Deprecation is "final"
- Harder to resurrect a profile
- Impact of addition of new status
- FTP site management considerations
- Identify which existing profiles are deprecated vs retired
- Where in the development cycle would the deprecation process be executed?
- take advantage of existing marketing channels (i.e. sent out a note along with public comment emails)
- caution against deprecating/intent to deprecate profiles that organizations have already spent effort implementing
- How would deprecation/retirement be handled in profiles already published in final text?
- Section headers, start of volume 1 profile add text to highlight deprecation status??
Next Steps
- PCC/Tone: define deprecated and retired, and propose back to DCC
- PCC/Tone: identify any PCC specific items and general items on profile deprecation process page and bring back to DCC
- Discuss w/DCC time/term for deprecation
- Propose to DCC to integration PCC Process to IHE Process