SWF.b FT Evaluation

Proposal

The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

Technical Committee Checklist

• Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
• Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
• Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
• Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
• Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?

• After checking with Lynn Felhofer, all connectathon issues have been addressed through CPs

• Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
• Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?

Technical Committee Consensus

• The Technical Committee agreed to continue with the Final Text Process and continue with an evaluation by the Planning Committee

Planning Committee Checklist

• Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
• Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
• Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
• Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
• Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
• (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
• Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
• Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile