Difference between revisions of "Rad TF Maintenance 2015-16"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:* CP-304 : Add Multiple Identity Resolution Option to SWF.b | :* CP-304 : Add Multiple Identity Resolution Option to SWF.b | ||
:* a couple of order-related CPs for CDS that may be long (not complex?) | :* a couple of order-related CPs for CDS that may be long (not complex?) | ||
+ | :* CP-RAD-328: Add OBR/ORC setmges to RAD -35 | ||
+ | :* CP-RAD-329: RAD-# needs to expand ORC-2 specification (HL7 v2.5.1 sematics) | ||
+ | :* CP_RAD-309: OBX Optinality in RAD-1,2,4 | ||
:* CP-314 MHD-I vs FHIR DSTU2 dependencies - might be simple change? but examples need rework in any case - might have to wait for ITI work on MHD | :* CP-314 MHD-I vs FHIR DSTU2 dependencies - might be simple change? but examples need rework in any case - might have to wait for ITI work on MHD | ||
Revision as of 10:19, 29 September 2015
Target Dates:
- Publish CP Ballot in early-Jan 2016 (for CPs needed for IHE-Europe Connectathon in April 2016)
- Allow adequate time at the Nov F2F Meeting to prep for this
- Publish CP Ballot at end-of-April 2016
- Incorporate FT CPs into updated TF released July 2016
- Publish CP Ballot in early-Jan 2016 (for CPs needed for IHE-Europe Connectathon in April 2016)
Number of outstanding CPs:
- 59 Assigned CPs to work on (up from 47 last cycle)
- For specifics refer to [1] and sort by Status
- (about 2/3 are stagnant) Should do a review/triage of dormant CPs and cancel or re-start
- 0 Completed CPs that failed ballot and need to be reworked
- 9 Submitted CPs to review/assign (as of Sept 10)
- 6 Final Text CPs to confirm have been incorporated into TF
List of "non-trivial" CPs:
- CP-304 : Add Multiple Identity Resolution Option to SWF.b
- a couple of order-related CPs for CDS that may be long (not complex?)
- CP-RAD-328: Add OBR/ORC setmges to RAD -35
- CP-RAD-329: RAD-# needs to expand ORC-2 specification (HL7 v2.5.1 sematics)
- CP_RAD-309: OBX Optinality in RAD-1,2,4
- CP-314 MHD-I vs FHIR DSTU2 dependencies - might be simple change? but examples need rework in any case - might have to wait for ITI work on MHD
List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:
- 4 more will be submitted soon for MRRT
- emails from U of Mainz (Dr. Mildenberger) with new as well
- Will submit one for MRRT new capabilities for optional conditions and another for business names
List of other maintenance tasks:
- Add 2 (estimated) FT Supplements to TF
- Repeat TOP TEN CPs process
- note that the list of CPs is increasing, not decreasing
- CP author distribution
- IHE-J National Extension document may need additional work (focus on SWF.b)
- Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
- MIMA needs to be updated to SWF.b (CP-304)
- complete IHE Rad CDS important, outstanding CPs and create new CPs which are a result of the IHE GAO public comment review including new appendix and mapping table; review additional public comments which came in after TI (approximately 20+); acknowledge that the rate of CPs will be high and will need to be addressed quickly; new CMS clarifications are supposed to be coming out soon which will result in yet more CPs
- complete IHE Rad RRR-WF: finish reviewing all public comments, publish for TI
- Ideally, this should be completed prior to the kick-off meeting in Nov.
- Adoption of new IHE Templates for Tech Framework
- An upcoming forcing function will be when we make Final Text any of the new supplements that have used the new supplement template which is intended to align with the new TF Template.
- Adoption of new IHE Templates for Tech Framework
- Profile Pages on Wiki
- Per the DCC, we are supposed to be including a short description on the wiki for each Supplement as it reaches TI stage. Radiology is 15 supplements behind and we need to get back up to date. The list of late updates is here (in orange): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R5aw4hgezmyJpt8eRwk35S6ofu93YU9u03h4LdVOKzI/edit?hl=en&authkey=CID59tIJ#gid=2 This will be enforced going forward. (8/25/2015) The short version goes here: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Profiles
- This task is assigned to the Planning Cmte. Does the Tech Cmte want to adopt it?
7. Risks
- Risk of effort spent on updating existing Supplements and TF to match new templates being low return-on-investment. (although it does have some payoff in terms of easier to read/understand spec for implementers, possibly lower error rate, and it will reduce work for volume editors folding new template supplements into the TF if the TF is aligned.)
9. Tech Cmte Evaluation
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
- xx% to do the identified work
- yy% if the Planning Cmte wants us to start dropping bits of maintenance work in favor of new Profile work
Candidate Coordinator:
- Kevin O'Donnell