PaLM Conf Minutes 2020-August-12
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Mary Kennedy | mkenned@cap.org |
| Raj Dash | r.dash@duke.edu |
| Rikki Merrick | rikimerrick@gmail.com |
| Craig Sayers | craig.sayers@nhs.net |
| Ralf Herzog | ralf.herzog@roche.com |
| Francesca Vanzo | fvanzo@consorzioarsenal.it |
| Dan Rutz | drutz@epic.com |
| Kevin Schap | kschap@cap.org |
| David Beckman | dbeckman@epic.com |
| James Harrison | james.harrison@virginia.edu |
| Nick Haarselhorst | Nick.Haarselhorst@philips.com |
| Ian Gabriel | Ian.gabriel@leicabiosystems.com |
Next call is September 9, 2020
- DPIA update
- DPIA update was sent by Mary for review prior to publication for Trial Publication
- Riki to send Raj the latest mapping between the specimen DAM and
- DPIA update was sent by Mary for review prior to publication for Trial Publication
- Digital pathology white paper publication
- Is there a way to publish tis so it is searchable in PubMed
- Ask Mary Yungers about IHE journal
- If not, can we submit to a peer reviewed paper
- Archives
- JAMIA
- Others?
- Is there a way to publish tis so it is searchable in PubMed
- Specimen DAM to FHIR mapping
- Many extensions needed, but could not find a way to support move Activity
- SET review
- Line 753 – Change LAW to LDA and then update which actor does aliquoting
- Appendix A – need to change Set to SET
- Reviewing the EVN codes for pathology
- EVN-4 is a CWE datatype
- No length restrictions
- User-defined
- Base has:
- 01 =
- 02 =
- 03 =
- O = other
- U = unknown
- Generic operations
- Do we need to split into Clinical and AP lab, or should we differentiate between changing existing specimen into something new vs just splitting out, but not altering the matrix
- SNOMED CT has procedure codes for aliquoting, centrifuging, freezing etc – could add more to the specimen preparation hierarchy = 56245008^Specimen preparation (procedure)^SCT
- Would be hard to pre-define all those operations
- Suggest for now to use O = other and then have folks elaborate in EVN-4.9 (original text)
- HOMEWORK: review the proposed descriptions and identify the ones we want to define here
- Derived Specimen Message Structure (is it ok to use the same message structure for multiple trigger events?)
- S49 – has SPM and then a group for the derived specimen
- Add (Source) after the first Specimen
- Add (Derived) after the Specimen in the Derived Specimen group
- Intention was to describe each specimen that has been created
- Need to still define the usage and cardinality for the Derived specimen group entries
- DERIVED SPEICMEN GROUP R [1..*]
- SGH R [1..1]
- SPM R [1..1]
- Observation group [0..*]
- OBX/SPM R [1..1]
- PRT/OBX/SPM O [0..1]
- Action items
- ALL to think about the codes needed for EVN and bring back suggestions for next call
- Riki to fill in the latest version of SET with the above comments and send to Alessandro
- Riki to send the latest version of the Specimen DAM to DICOM mapping to Raj and upload to the wiki page for reference