Difference between revisions of "ITI Agenda 2017-2018"
Mzanardini (talk | contribs) |
Mzanardini (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
| id="11-15-1130" | RESTful ATNA | | id="11-15-1130" | RESTful ATNA | ||
| style="text-align: left" | | | style="text-align: left" | | ||
+ | |||
+ | The core of the proposal is to identify Two transport mechanisms for the same transaction (syslog and RESTful/FHIR). Both the specification needs to be locked to the same abstract definition, so that we can continue the profiling in a transport independent manner. This could impact ITI20. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ANSWER: Rfc3881 is the abstract model to take in consideration. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Re-factore ITI-20 could be in scope: decided tomorrow based on the resources available. Maybe use one transaction with two flavors… | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Author: Rob , no mentor needed;'' Reviewers: Mauro, Brad, | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> |
Revision as of 06:05, 20 November 2017
November 2017 F2F – Technical Profile Kick-Off Meeting, 15–16 November 2017
This 2-day meeting is focused on a review of the detailed profile proposals, and selection of work items for the 2016/2017 year based on committee resources and technical readiness.
- Meeting Location
- RSNA Building, Oak Brook, IL
- WebEx information for this meeting is
- Meeting Number: 927 055 967
- Password: Ask Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)
- Link: Click here
- Support material
- Profile proposals and other support information may be found in the meeting folder
Agenda & Minutes
All times listed are tentative, and may be revised during the meeting—refresh often.
Wednesday, 15 November, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CST, UTC−06:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:00 am–8:30 am | — | Breakfast | — |
8:30 am–9:00 am | Elliot/Mauro | Introductions and Agenda Review
|
Participants: Jeremiah Meyers (HIMMS), Joey Lamy (AEIGS) , John Moherke (By Light), Pim van der Eijk (EU Commission) Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Chris Melo (Philips), Lawrence , Ben , Vassil Peytchev (EPIC), Matt Blackmon (Sequoia Prj), Celina Roth (HIMMS), Dymitro Rud (IHE Swiss), Ken Meyer (IBM Watson), Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Lynn Felhofer (ITI Tech Manager), Tarik Idris (ICW), Robert Horn (AGFA), Karima Blounquard (IHE Europe) , Anna Orlova (AHIMA), Massimiliano Masi (EU Commission / Tiani). Sponsor communications: details about the vol.1 meeting will be shared soon by the sponsors. The meeting will be held in Oslo in February (see details about meeting dates above). Elliot reviewed the agenda. Co-chairs ask new profile editors, if they are aware of patents that affects standards selected. If anyone knows it, please make Co-chairs aware. This does not mean that this is a problem and we can either: find out a work-around, or manage licensing via IHE international. The patent disclosure is on the WIKI: Patent Disclosure. Plan for the actual F2F: We will start from the Planning Cmte ranking, and we will evaluate each proposal and will identify the amount of work we can do, and identify the bandwidth of the cmte. Requirements for Authors: have regular tcons between f2f meetings. In-person participation to f2f is strongly recommended but not required. |
9:00 am–10:00 am | Dmytro Rud | Cross-Community Metadata Update (XCMU) |
XCMU – Aimed to define single transaction very similar to iti-57, adding the target Community ID. Interest has been expressed by Germany, Austria and IHE Europe. The cmte still needs to clarify the scope: Is the focus related to the management of structural or non-structural ? The initial prposal of Dymitro:
Dymitro is asked to restrict the number of use-cases: to only document metadata and document deprecation, avoiding change of structural metadata in the first scenario (a first analysis pointed out that we should EXCLUDE: patientID, documentUniqueId, repositoryUniqueId, objectType, hash , size ... we complete analysis will be done during the working calls). The Idea of the cmte is to come out with a safe sub-set of metadata and se-cases, that will make easy to do the profiling. NOTE: Attention should be put on SourceId, actual implementations of the Registry have a list of admitted sourceIDs, this is not correct in a cross-community environment. Lynn raise the point that we are making a supplement to a supplement of XDS. We have to keep this separate from MU. The relationship should be strongly taken in consideration. Maybe this work-item should be renamed in order to keep it separate from MU. On the other hand, it could open up an opportunity to work on MU, in order to change it, refactoring MU… In that case the size of the work-item will increase drastically. We should keep the scope controlled. Removal of document from Repo is not in scope. Dymitro : author , and IHE Swiss will contribute with co-editors. Mentor identifyied: Ken. Reviewers: Juerg Bleuer , Tony Schaller (IHE Swiss), Tarik (ICW).
|
10:00 am–11:15 am | Massimiliano Masi / Charles Parisot | AS4 extensions for Document Sharing |
Option in development:
If we just take the security layer instead of the SOAP header option, this will be more isolated and will not impact actual implementation. THIS CANNOT BE GRANTED, maybe change in soap header will be still needed. We can limit the AS4 usage between the initiating and responding gateways. This will make things more contained. There is agreement on this requirement. Are Vendors oriented to one specific option among the three? This is not known right now. This will be taken in consideration during the tech evaluation. DEADLINE for the decision and criteria for the decision should be identified clearly. Test tools are not an issue. An open source tool is already available online and EU commission will invest in combine IHE test tool and AS4 tools. The impact could be in iti-19 on the WS-I Async part of the spec. Massimiliano: primary Author. Charles mentor . Reviewers: Vassil , Sylvie , Gregorio/Giacomo (Arsenàl.IT), Forcare (???) , Dave Franken (???), Intersystems (???).
|
11:15 am–11:30 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:30 am–12:30 am | Rob Horn | RESTful ATNA |
The core of the proposal is to identify Two transport mechanisms for the same transaction (syslog and RESTful/FHIR). Both the specification needs to be locked to the same abstract definition, so that we can continue the profiling in a transport independent manner. This could impact ITI20. ANSWER: Rfc3881 is the abstract model to take in consideration. Re-factore ITI-20 could be in scope: decided tomorrow based on the resources available. Maybe use one transaction with two flavors… Author: Rob , no mentor needed; Reviewers: Mauro, Brad, |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–2:30 pm | Vincent van Pelt | Metadata Guidelines | |
2:30 pm–3:30 pm | Elliot Silver | FHIR Tooling | |
3:30 pm–3:45 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:45 pm–4:15 pm | Anna Orlova | Patient Administration (PAM) US national extension | |
4:15 pm–4:30 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Review, homework, agenda updates | |
4:30 pm–5:30 pm | TBD | Joint session of ITI/PCC/QRPH Technical
|
In the Room:
Jeremiah Myers (HIMSS), Joe Lamy, Pim Van Der Berg, Chris Melo, Mauro Zanardini, Raffaele Giordano, Sylvie Colas, Ben Levy, Chaub Perisot, Matt Blackmon, Nichole Drye-Mayo, Lauren Lemioux, Elliot Silver, Alaina Elliot, Laura Bright, Maddie Mailly, John Stam, Derek Ritz, Lori Forquet, Didi Davis, Emma Jones, Gila Pyke, Thomson Kuhn, Caila Brander, Andrea Fourquet, Michael Clifton, Amit Popat, Denise Downing, Lauren Groden,
Lynn Felhofer, Ken Meyer |
Thursday, 16 November, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CST, UTC−06:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:00 am–8:30 am | — | Breakfast | — |
8:30 am–8:45 am | Elliot/Mauro | Introductions and Agenda Review
|
|
8:45 am–9:15 am | Lynn Felhofer | Technical Framework Maintenance proposal
Alternatives for F2F TF Maintenance time:
|
For the 2017-18 publication cycle, TF Maintenance/CPs will only be done in tcons; no F2F time. |
9:15 am–10:15 am | Ruth Berge | Survey of Network Interfaces Form (SNIF) | |
10:15 am–11:00 am | Elliot/Mauro | Complete evaluation matrix
Decide on items work to be recommended to ITI Planning Committee |
|
11:00 am–11:15 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:15 am–12:00 noon | Elliot/Mauro | Continue profile evaluation/selection | |
12:00 noon–12:30 pm | John/Daniel | Joint session with ITI Planning Committee
|
|
12:30 pm–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–2:00 pm | Mauro/Elliot | Schedule T-cons through to February F2F
Remind authors of expectations |
|
2:00 pm–3:30 pm | Lynn Felhofer | Technical Framework Maintenance working session
Assigned CPs ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/1_Assigned/
|
Swan song of TF Mtce during F2F mtgs this cycle: These CPs were discussed. Next step identified:
|
3:30 pm–3:45 pm | Mauro/Elliot — |
Wrap-up, Adjorn Afternoon "Break" |
— |